\begin{table}[!h]

\caption{Linear models on anticlerical violence against female clerics (nuns)\label{tab:lm_nuns}}
\centering
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}[t]{lccc}
\toprule
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{LM (log)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Logit (binary)} \\
\cmidrule(l{3pt}r{3pt}){2-2} \cmidrule(l{3pt}r{3pt}){3-4}
  & (1) & (2) & (3)\\
\midrule
Employers' association & 0.039* & 0.195 & 0.213\\
 & (0.017) & (0.417) & (0.419)\\
CNT union & 0.022+ & 0.447 & 0.536+\\
 & (0.012) & (0.411) & (0.285)\\
UGT union & -0.002 & -0.327 & -0.012\\
 & (0.007) & (0.426) & (0.492)\\
Population (log) & 0.015* & 1.579*** & 0.696*\\
 & (0.007) & (0.361) & (0.332)\\
Leftist support 1936 & -0.009 & -1.639 & -0.660\\
 & (0.009) & (1.904) & (1.140)\\
Days of Republican control (log) & 0.003 & -0.205 & 0.534*\\
 & (0.002) & (0.252) & (0.270)\\
Illiteracy 1930 & -0.088** & -4.793* & 0.006\\
 & (0.027) & (2.391) & (1.633)\\
Number of clerics (log) & 0.034** & 0.373* & 0.713***\\
 & (0.011) & (0.162) & (0.157)\\
\midrule
$n$ & 3948 & 2715 & 3948\\
$R^2$ & 0.12 &  & \\
Adj. $R^2$ & 0.12 &  & \\
AIC & -3654.64 & 282.27 & 310.07\\
Province FE & Yes & Yes & No\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\begin{tablenotes}[para]
\item \textit{Note: } 
\item + p $<$ 0.1, * p $<$ 0.05, ** p $<$ 0.01, *** p $<$ 0.001. Province FE not shown, clustered SE (province). Only municipalities that were at least one day under Republican control. Model 1 includes the logged number of female clerics killed as dependent variable, and Models 2 and 3 use a binary indicator as dependent variable. According to our data, we only register killings of female clerics in 48 municipalities (slightly over 1 per cent). Due to perfect separation problems, Model 2 includes province FE but limits the sample to provinces with variation, while Model 3 includes the full sample without province FE.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table}
